Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-38581
Perkutane Karotisangioplastie mit Stentimplantation und Embolieprotektion
Eine prospektive Studie bei 100 konsekutiven BehandlungenPercutaneous carotid angioplasty with stent implantation and protection device against embolismA prospective study of 100 consecutive casesPublication History
eingereicht: 16.12.2002
akzeptiert: 25.3.2003
Publication Date:
10 April 2003 (online)

Hintergrund und Fragestellung: Die perkutane Stentimplantation bei Patienten mit extrakraniellen Stenosen der A. carotis mittels Ballondilatation und Stentversorgung wird als Alternative zur Karotischirurgie immer häufiger eingesetzt. Wir berichten über den klinischen Verlauf nach 100 konsekutiven Behandlungen, im Rahmen eines prospektiven Therapieregister.
Patienten und Methodik: 69 Männer und 22 Frauen (mittleres Alter 69 ± 10 Jahre) wurden an 100 symptomatischen (41 %) oder asymptomatischen und progredienten (59 %) > 80 %igen Stenosen der A. carotis behandelt. Die Patienten waren komorbid und hatten ein hohes vaskuläres Risiko. 70% wären wegen einer und 34% wegen2 Kontraindikationen nicht für die NASCET-Studie (30) geeignet gewesen, bei 84% lag eine symptomatische koronare Herzkrankheit vor, bei 14 % eine deutlich reduzierte linksventrikuläre Auswurffraktion von < 40 %. Alle Patienten erhielten eine kombinierte Aspirin- und Clopidogreltherapie sowie prä- und postinterventionelle neurologische Konsiliaruntersuchuung. Unter Verwendung eines Embolieprotektionssystems (28× distale Ballonokklusion, 72× Filterapplikation) wurden insgesamt 99 Stents implantiert. Der Nachbeobachtungszeitraum betrug im Mittel 10,4 ± 8,2 [1-29] Monate.
Ergebnisse: Die angiografische Erfolgsrate betrug 99 %. Periinterventionell kam es bei 4 % der Patienten zu einer flüchtigen neurologischen Symptomatik (2× TIA, 2× PRIND), 2× zu einem minor stroke. Der bei 90 % der Interventionen aus der Embolieprotektion zu gewinnende Debris wies einen maximalen Durchmesser von 311 ± 431 (30 - 1850) µm auf. Die maximale Partikelgröße korrelierte zu keinem angiografischen oder klinischen Parameter, außer zur Symptomatik der Patienten vor Stentimplantation (p < 0,04). Der kombinierte Endpunkt (Tod und jeder Schlaganfall) wurde nach 30 Tagen fünfmal verzeichnet (5,0 %).
Folgerung: Die Stentimplantation unter distaler Embolieprotektion stellt ein neues Behandlungsverfahren als Alternative zur Karotischirurgie dar, welches mit hoher primärer Erfolgs- und geringer Restenoserate auch bei schweren Begleiterkrankungen klinische Resultate ermöglicht, die denen der operativen Behandlung zumindest gleichwertig scheinen.
Background and objective: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting of internal carotid artery stenosis has been increasingly practiced as an alternative to carotid embolectomy, particularly since the development of cerebral protection devices. 100 consecutive elective percutanous carotid stenting procedures were carried out in our centre. We here present the clinical outcome and follow-up of these patients.
Patients and Methods: 69 men and 22 women, average age 69 ± 10 years with symptomatic (41 %) or asymptomatic and progressive (59 %) > 80 % stenosis of the internal carotid artery were treated. There was a high rate of co-morbidity and a high vascular risk. 64 % would have been excluded from the NASCET trial because of one, 31 % because of two or more contraindications. In 84 % of the patients symptomatic coronary artery disease was present, in13 % a significantly reduced left ventricular function (LVEF < 40 %). Pre- and post-procedure all patients were given aspirin and clopidogrel and examined by an independant neurologist. 99 stents were placed with the use of an embolic protection device (28 times with distal balloon occlusion, 72 times with a filter device).The follow-up period averaged 10.4 ± 8.2.(1 - 29 months).
Results: The angiographic success rate was 99 %. During the procedure transient neurological symptoms were experienced by 4 % of patients (2× TIA, 2× PRIND) and a minor stroke resulted in two. In 90 % of the interventions debris was collected from the embolic protection device. The maximum diameter of particles was 311±431 (30 - 1850) µm. There was some correlation between patients’ symptoms prior to stent implantation and maximum particle size (p < 0,04), but none with any other angiographic or clinical parameters. The combined endpoint (death and any stroke) after 30 days occured 5 times (5 %). A subacute stent thrombosis occurred once, restenosis in two patients.
Conclusion: Carotid artery stenting with use of a distal embolic protection device is a feasible new alternative to carotid endarterectomy. Our results indicate high success rate and low complication rates, even in patients with severe co-morbidity. The results compare well with surgical figures. Our favourable results are supported by data emerging from current randomized multicenter trials and a large therapy registry. However, long-term follow-up will still be required.
Literatur
- 1
Al-Mubarak N, Rubin G S, Vitek J J, Iyer S S, New G, Leon M B.
Effect of the distal-balloon protection system on microembolization during carotid
stenting.
Circulation.
2001;
104
1999-2002
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Al-Mubarak N, Colombo A, Gaines P A. et al .
Multicenter evaluation of carotid artery stenting with a filter protection system.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2002;
39
841-846
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Bergeron P, Becquemin J P, Jausseron J M. et al .
Percutaneous stenting of the internal carotid artery; the European CAST I study.
Carotid Artery Stent Trial.
J Endovasc Surg.
1999;
6
155-159
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Blackburn H, Keys A, Simonson E. et al .
The electrocardiogram in population studies: a classification system.
Circulation.
1960;
21
1160-1175
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Bonita R, Beaglehole R.
Modification of Rankin Scale: Recovery of motor function after stroke.
Stroke.
1988;
19
1497-1500
MissingFormLabel
- 6
CAPRIE Steering Committee .
A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of
ischaemic events ( CAPRIE).
Lancet.
1996;
248
1329-1339
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Chesebro J H, Knatterud G, Roberts R. et al .
Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial, Phase 1: A comparison between
intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase.
Circulation.
1987;
76
142-154
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Eastcott H H, Pickering G W, Rob C G.
Reconstruction of internal carotid artery in a patient with intermittent attackes
of hemiplegia.
Lancet.
1954;
267
994-996
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Brown M M, Rogers J, Blank J M. for the CAVATAS investigators .
Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the
carotid and vertebral artery transluminal angioplasty study (CAVATAS); a randomized
trial.
Lancet.
2001;
357
1729-1737
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study .
Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.
JAMA.
1995;
273
1421-1428
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Gagne P J, Matchett J, MacFarland D.
Can the NASCET technique for measuring carotid stenosis be reliably applied outside
the trial?.
J Vasc Surg.
1996;
24
449-455
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Goldstein L B. et al .
Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale.
Arch Neurol.
1989;
46
660-662
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Gussenhoven E J, Essed C E, Lancee C T. et al .
Arterial wall characteristics determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging: an
in vivo study.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
1989;
14
947-952
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Henry M, Amor M, Henry I. et al .
Angioplasty and stenting of the external carotid arteries.
J Endovasc Surg.
1998;
5
293-304
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Henry M, Amor M, Henry I. et al .
Carotid stenting with cerebral protection: first clinical experience using the PercuSurge
GuardWire system.
J Endovasc Ther.
1999;
6
321-331
MissingFormLabel
- 16 Iyer S S, Vitek J J, New G. et al .Carotid Angioplasty and Stenting: Technique and Results. In: Marco J, P. Serruys, B. Giancario, J. Fajadet, P. de Feyter, M. Morice (eds):
The Paris Course on Revascularization 2001. First ed 2001: 365-384
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Jaeger H J, Mathias K D, Drescher R. et al .
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging after angioplasty plus stenting of artery supplying
the brain.
Am J Neuroradiol.
2001;
22
1251-1259
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Jaeger H, Mathias K D, Hauth E. et al .
Cerebral ischemia detected with diffusion-weighted MR imaging after stent implantation
in the carotid artery.
Am J Neuroradiol.
2002;
23
200-207
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Markus H S, Clifton A, Buckenham T, Brown M M.
Carotid angioplasty. Detection of embolic signals during and after the procedure.
Stroke.
1994;
25
2403-2406
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Mathias K, Jäger H, Sahl H, Hennings S, Gißler H -M.
Die endoluminale Therapie der Karotisstenose.
Dt Ärztebl.
1999;
96
A-2502-A-2508
MissingFormLabel
- 21 Hermanek P, Mersdorf E. Qualitätsbericht Krankenhaus Bayern 2001/2002, der Bayerischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft
für Qualitätssicherung in der stationären Versorgung. (BAQ), München 2002: 179-199
MissingFormLabel
- 22
New G, Roubin G S, Iyer S S, Al-Mubarak N, Vitek J J.
Overview of carotid stenting.
Cardiology International.
2002;
3
43-48
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Ohki T, Roubin G S, Veith F J, Iyer S S, Brady E.
Efficacy of a filter device in the prevention of embolic events during carotid angioplasty
and stenting: An ex-vivo analysis.
J Vasc Surg.
1999;
30
1034-1044
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Parodi J C, La Mura R, Ferreira L M. et al .
Initial evaluation of carotid angioplasty and stenting with three different cerebral
protection devices.
J Vasc Surg.
2000;
32
1127-1136
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Reimers B, Corvaja N, Moshiri S. et al .
Cerebral protection with filter devices during carotid artery stenting.
Circulation.
2001;
104
12-15
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Roubin G S, Yadav S, Iyer S S, Vitek J.
Carotid stent-supported angioplasty: a neurovascular intervention to prevent stroke.
Am J Cardiol.
1996;
78
8-12
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Schömig A, Neuman F, Kastrati A. et al .
A randomized comparison of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy after the placement
of coronary artery stents.
N Eng J Med.
1996;
334
1084-1089
MissingFormLabel
- 28
Shawl F, Kadro W, Domanski M J. et al .
Safety and efficacy of elective carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2000;
35
1721-1728
MissingFormLabel
- 29
Stankovic G, Liistro F, Moshiri S. et al .
Carotid Artery Stenting in the first 100 consecutive patients: results and followup.
Heart.
2002;
88
381-386
MissingFormLabel
- 30
The European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group .
Endarterectomy for moderate symptomatic carotid stenosis; final results from MRC
European Carotid Surgery Trial.
Lancet.
1998;
351
1379-1387
MissingFormLabel
- 31
The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaberators .
Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade
carotid stenosis.
N Eng J Med.
1991;
325
445-453
MissingFormLabel
- 32
The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial .
Methods, patient characteristics and progress.
Stroke.
1991;
22
711-720
MissingFormLabel
- 33
Tübler T, Schluter M, Dirsch O, Sievert H. et al .
Balloon-protected carotid artery stenting: relationship of periprocedural neurological
complications with size of particulate debris.
Circulation.
2001;
104
2791-2796
MissingFormLabel
- 34
Wholey M H, Wholey M, Mathias K. et al .
Global experience in cervical carotid stent placement.
Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent.
2000;
50
160-167
MissingFormLabel
- 35 Wholey M H. Vortrag bei der Jahrestagung der International Society of Endovascular Therapy (ISET),. Miami 2001
MissingFormLabel
- 36 Yadav J S. Vortrag bei der Jahrestagung der American Heart Association,. New Orleans 2002
MissingFormLabel
Prof. Dr. med. Harald Mudra
2. Medizinische Abteilung, Krankenhaus Neuperlach, Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Oskar-Maria-Graf-Ring 51
81737 München
Email: h.mudra@kh-neuperlach.de